John Marshall has spent more than four decades building JM Search from a one-person operation into a major retained executive search firm. In this conversation with Fahad Jalal, he breaks down what actually scales in executive search: not just process, technology, or brand, but judgment, people development, equity alignment, private equity expertise, and a culture where consultants are expected to think like entrepreneurs. The episode moves from John’s early days mailing résumés and buying the firm’s first computer, into the hard lessons of growing from a small founder-led firm into a $100M+ organization. But the real through-line is more durable: executive search is still a human business. AI can accelerate research, reporting, market mapping, and targeting, but it cannot replace the ability to assess a leader, understand motivation, pressure-test what feels off, or help a client and candidate make a high-stakes decision. That is why John’s advice to young search professionals is so direct: listen deeply, develop a critical eye, and do not treat this as a fee-chasing business.
Key Takeaways
- JM Search scaled organically by letting people develop, giving emerging leaders real responsibility, and eventually organizing around practices and entrepreneurial P&Ls.
- John’s view is that executive search has changed technologically, but the core work has not: find an A-player, assess them deeply, and make sure they fit the client.
- Access to names is no longer the differentiator. Judgment, motivation assessment, due diligence, and relationship-building are.
- JM Search’s equity model is a major cultural lever, with John framing wealth creation for employees as part of his job as founder.
- Great CEOs today need more than strategy and numbers. John puts empathy, trust, and the “it factor” at the center of executive assessment.
- Private equity has evolved from financial engineering toward deeper operational involvement, which has made leadership hiring more strategic.
- AI is useful because it gives search professionals more time to recruit, speak with people, and understand them — not because it replaces the human side.
- For people entering search, John’s advice is blunt: get real-world experience first, learn people skills, and develop a critical eye before you try to make placements.
From A One-Man Band To a $100M+ Search Firm
John’s story starts in a very different version of executive search.
After college, he answered a newspaper ad for a “management consultant trainee,” which turned out to be a two-person search firm. He got the job, by his own description, with “absolutely zero qualifications” other than being inexpensive to hire. After three years, he felt he had learned what he could, and at 25, with very little overhead and very little to lose, he started JM Search.
The early version of the firm was almost comically simple: low rent, an old metal desk, a filing cabinet, a typewriter, phone bills, and mailed résumés. No fax machines. No internet. No modern database infrastructure. It was just a person, a phone, and a lot of persistence.
That origin matters because it explains the operating philosophy that still runs through the episode. John does not talk like someone who believes executive search is magic. He talks like someone who understands it as a craft built through repetition, judgment, relationships, and time.
The First Growth Stage Was Not Strategy. It Was Perseverance.
When Fahad asks John to break down the journey from zero to $10M, $10M to $50M, and then into the $100M+ range, John’s answer is refreshingly unromantic.
The first stage was hard work, perseverance, time, and letting people develop. JM Search did not have the money to bring in highly experienced people early. So the firm had to grow its own talent. People learned together, improved together, and gradually built capability.
The next stage required more sophistication. John describes bringing in stronger people, forming an advisory board, building infrastructure, upgrading finance, adding HR, improving IT, and developing the systems required to operate at scale. That is the part many founders underplay. Scaling is not just selling more. It is building the internal structure so growth does not break the firm.
The more interesting move came when JM Search organized into practices and gave people who had never managed before the opportunity to lead. John says five of the six people placed into those early practice-leader roles are still with the company and have grown those practices dramatically.
That is a real scaling lesson: sometimes the people who build the next chapter are already inside the company, but they need responsibility before they look fully ready.
Why Great Companies Stop Being Founder-Led In Every Decision
As JM Search grew, decision-making had to move beyond John.
He describes the firm as consensus-driven, with committees for finance, equity, talent, and other key areas. This was not just governance theater. It was a way to let people across the company participate in how the firm is run. John is clear that he is not a command-and-control leader now, even if some early-stage version of that was necessary when the firm was tiny.
That shift is one of the harder founder transitions. A founder can be the decision engine at $2M. That does not work the same way at $100M+. At some point, the company has to create leaders who can run parts of the business with real ownership.
John’s framing of JM Search is useful: in many ways, he says, it operates like a holding company with functional and subject-matter experts, each driven by a P&L, while still sharing systems, process, and collaboration.
Stick To The Knitting Before Chasing Adjacencies
One of the sharpest strategic points in the episode is John’s resistance to overcomplication.
When asked what JM Search needs to do to keep growing, he says he likes to keep things simple. He jokes that he has grown to dislike the words “strategy” and “change management,” preferring to think in terms of communication and execution. That does not mean strategy is irrelevant. It means he is wary of abstract language that can distract from the work.
His answer is clear: for now, JM Search wants to continue being a great executive recruiting firm in North America. Could it go global? Potentially. Could it branch into other services? Possibly. But the current priority is doing executive search better.
That is more disciplined than it sounds. A lot of successful firms dilute themselves by chasing adjacent services before they have fully exploited the market they already understand. John’s view is that executive search is still a large enough market to support significant growth if the firm simply keeps improving at the core business.
Executive Search Changed Around The Edges, Not At The Center
John has lived through the evolution from mailed résumés to databases, from fax machines to LinkedIn, from Rolodexes to AI. But when asked how executive search has changed, he does not overstate the transformation.
His answer: the recruiting aspect has not changed that much. You are still looking for an A-player who is the right fit for the client, and you still have to go into the market and find that person.
The biggest changes, in his view, are around the ecosystem of services and technology. He sees many firms trying to sell more adjacent services — leadership assessment, board work, advisory products — and he worries that in some cases it can create conflicts of interest. JM Search’s approach, according to John, is to align with vetted consulting firms and recommend them when clients need those services, rather than trying to own everything itself.
That is a positioning choice. It says: we want to be trusted advisors, but we do not need to monetize every adjacent need ourselves.
LinkedIn Made Names Easier. It Did Not Make Hiring Easier.
This may be the cleanest category insight in the episode.
Fahad points out that the old Rolodex advantage has disappeared. Today, you can often get to the names. John agrees that access has changed, but he argues the real differentiator is the same as it was decades ago: assessing someone well, understanding motivation, knowing whether they are truly an A-player, and figuring out whether they have the “it factor.”
That is why he rejects the idea that companies can simply pull names from LinkedIn, ZipRecruiter, board referrals, or a casual network and call it executive hiring. A name is not a candidate. A résumé is not a hire. A phone call is not diligence.
John says people often tell him they have a great candidate, and his response is basically: have you really checked them out? Until you have done serious diligence, you do not know.
He even breaks down his own time allocation: roughly half recruiting, a large portion doing due diligence on recruited candidates, and a smaller portion working with clients and understanding their needs. The exact split is less important than the point: search is not name generation. It is judgment under uncertainty.
Operators Can Make Great Search Consultants But Search Is Not For Everyone
The episode also gets into a question that has become more important as more operators, HR leaders, and consultants move into executive search.
John is generally positive on people entering search with operational or industry experience. They have seen more. They understand companies from the inside. They may have a broader view of what good looks like than someone who entered search directly.
But he adds a very real caveat: will they actually enjoy search?
That is the part people underestimate. Executive search can look attractive from the outside because it can be financially rewarding and intellectually interesting. But the work itself is a grind. You get an assignment, you work the market, you speak with people, you figure out who is good, you check them out, and you manage the client process. It is repetitive. It requires persistence. It is far more one-dimensional than many operating roles.
That is a useful warning. Operational expertise helps, but it does not automatically mean someone will enjoy or succeed in the search business.
The best firms, John suggests, find ways to use those broader skill sets beyond pure execution giving people committee roles, leadership opportunities, and ways to contribute to the firm more broadly.
Earning The Bag Still Requires Gravitas
Fahad asks about career progression in executive search: the old model of carrying the bag for a consultant versus today’s more structured analyst-to-partner ladders.
John’s answer is practical. At JM Search, he is happy for anyone to earn the bag when they are ready to represent the firm well. But readiness is not just ambition. It requires gravitas, trust, respect, and the ability to sit with clients in a way that creates confidence.
He gives credit to the large search firms for training and exposure to senior roles, but argues that at a firm like JM Search, people may be able to move into leadership faster and with more entrepreneurial ownership. That is a real cultural difference. The large firms may offer brand and structure. A scaled entrepreneurial firm may offer faster ownership and more room to lead.
The key point: career speed only matters if the person is actually ready. In search, being promoted before you can earn trust in the market is not an advantage. It is a liability.
Equity Is Culture, Not Just Compensation
One of the most distinctive parts of the conversation is John’s discussion of JM Search’s equity structure.
He says the firm has 85 equity holders, with an equity committee that identifies high performers who have earned the opportunity to participate. The structure is intentionally simple: people can buy equity, distributions from firm profitability help them buy in over time, and they are paid out over time when they retire or sell.
The mechanics matter, but the philosophy matters more.
John says he did not think twice about sharing equity. His mindset was that it was his job to create wealth and financial security for the people who work at the firm. That is a rare founder line because it is not dressed up in institutional language. It is straightforward: if the people build the company, they should participate in the value.
That helps explain the retention and culture story. Compensation alone does not create culture, but equity can reinforce a culture of ownership if people believe it is real, meaningful, and aligned with long-term growth.
The Modern CEO Needs Empathy, Trust, And The “It Factor”
When Fahad asks how the anatomy of the CEO has changed over the decades, John’s answer is clear: the old hard-edged model is gone.
CEOs still need to know the numbers. They still need to be smart, strategic, and willing to hold people accountable. Those are table stakes. But John argues that the real difference is whether people trust them, believe in them, and want to follow them. If their people do not like them, have confidence in them, or trust them, it will not work.
That does not mean leadership is a popularity contest. It means the “if you want a friend, get a dog” era of leadership has aged badly. The best executives now need enough empathy and human credibility to build confidence while still driving performance.
John’s assessment method reflects that. He talks about drilling into what people who worked for the candidate really think, and whether they would put their life savings behind that person. That is a strong test because it asks something deeper than competence: do people trust this person with something that matters?
Everybody Looks Good On Paper. The Work Starts After That.
John is blunt that everyone looks good on paper. Nobody writes a résumé that says they underperformed, damaged a team, or failed to deliver returns. That is why search cannot stop at credentials.
The real work is getting to know the person, building enough relationship to understand them, and then applying judgment. When something feels off, John says you have to go after it hard. Ask the question directly. Bring the concern to the candidate. Keep drilling down.
This is where a partner-led search model has teeth. If the senior person is not deeply involved, these moments can get missed. And those moments often matter more than the clean facts.
John’s advice is not to rely on vague “gut feel” alone. It is to treat discomfort as a signal that deserves investigation. If something does not look right, dig into it because that is what the client is paying for.
Private Equity Raised The Stakes For Search
John’s view of private equity is direct: he likes it because it is measurable. A company is bought at one point, and the job is to create value and take it somewhere else within a defined time frame, often five to seven years. That urgency creates a clear leadership challenge.
But he is also realistic about the asset class. PE firms can overpay. They do not always know exactly what they are buying. They sometimes hire the wrong CEOs. And many PE professionals are excellent transaction people but have not actually run businesses themselves.
That is why private equity has evolved. John points out that PE firms have hired stronger operating teams over time, with more ability to assess management, understand why companies are missing numbers, and help portfolio companies improve rather than simply monitor them.
For search firms, that changes the mandate. The work is not just “fill a CEO role.” It is help the sponsor and company make a leadership decision that can actually support the value-creation plan.
Why JM Search Fits Private Equity Differently
John describes JM Search’s private equity advantage in a few layers: years of experience in the asset class, senior people who know and care about clients, support teams that help partners spend real time developing candidates, and a structure organized around functional and subject-matter expertise.
There is another important point: John says JM Search’s leaders mirror the leaders PE firms want to hire. They are not just search consultants. They are running businesses inside the firm, with P&L responsibility and entrepreneurial ownership.
That matters. A search partner advising a portfolio company CEO or sponsor has more credibility when they themselves understand ownership, accountability, and performance pressure.
The episode also touches on a key difference from larger search firms: willingness to help below the most glamorous C-suite mandate. John says if JM Search places a C-suite executive and that leader needs help building the team underneath, it is the firm’s job to help them win — even if the fees are smaller and the roles are less glamorous.
That is a strong PE service philosophy. Portfolio companies do not just need a single executive. They often need the team architecture around that executive to work.
AI Gives Search Professionals Time Back And That Is The Point
John is not trying to sound like an AI theorist. His view is more useful because it is practical.
He sees AI helping with information gathering, researchers, reporting structure, market targeting, and other parts of the search workflow. That alone is a major advantage because it gives search professionals more time to do what they should be doing: recruiting people, speaking with them, and getting to know them.
That is exactly the right frame.
AI is not valuable because it makes executive search less human. It is valuable because it removes work that prevents search professionals from being human enough where it matters.
John’s strongest line is that executive search is a business of humans. The client wants a human perspective. The candidate wants a human perspective. AI can produce facts, but it cannot be human.
That is not anti-AI. It is a clear boundary: AI supports the craft; it does not replace the relationship, judgment, or trust behind the craft.
Closing Advice
John’s advice to people entering executive search is not what every young person wants to hear.
If someone is just getting started, he would not recommend entering search straight out of school. He suggests working somewhere first, selling, learning people skills, understanding what a company is like, and building some industry experience. For people already in the business, his advice is to listen and learn from the people they speak with, develop a critical eye, and avoid becoming someone who is only trying to place a candidate to make a fee.
That is the right bar for executive search.
The best search professionals are not résumé movers. They are not LinkedIn operators. They are not fee chasers. They are people who can listen, assess, pressure-test, and advise when the stakes are high and the obvious answer may be wrong.
That is also why AI will not eliminate the category. It will expose the weak parts of it. If a search professional’s value is only finding names, AI is a threat. If their value is human judgment, diligence, client trust, and candidate understanding, AI becomes leverage.
Best Quotes
- “This is a business of humans and the client wants a human perspective. The candidate wants a human perspective.”
- “AI can spit out all the facts in the world, but they’re not human.”
- “Until you really check somebody out thoroughly, you don’t know if you have a great candidate or not.”
- “If you see something that doesn’t look right, go back and dig into it hard.”
- “It’s my job to create wealth and financial security for the people that work here.”
- “If you’re just looking to make a fee, we don’t want you here.”
What To Do Next
- Separate name access from candidate quality.
Finding someone on LinkedIn is not the same as knowing whether they are the right executive for the role. - Do more diligence than feels convenient.
If something feels off, do not ignore it. Ask the hard question and keep digging. - Build search teams around ownership, not just execution.
Give people real responsibility and let them develop into leaders before every box is perfectly checked. - Use AI to give humans more time with humans.
Automate research drag, reporting, market targeting, and administrative work so partners can spend more time recruiting and assessing. - If you serve PE, think beyond the C-suite placement.
The job is not only to place the CEO. It is to help that CEO and portfolio company win. - For younger search professionals, build people skills before chasing the fee.
Learn how companies work, how people make decisions, and how to listen before trying to sell yourself as an advisor.
About The Guest
John Marshall is the Founder and CEO of JM Search. He founded the firm in 1980 and has spent decades helping companies build management teams. JM Search describes the firm as one of the largest retained search firms in North America and focused on serving private equity, venture capital, and growth-oriented organizations. John focuses on CEO, C-level, and board searches and has executed over 500 searches across industries.
Want Early Access?
QLU is building AI-native workflows for executive search teams that want to move faster without losing the human judgment that makes great search work.
Use QLU to map markets faster, surface better candidates, and give your team more time to do the work AI cannot replace: recruiting, assessing, advising, and closing.
Ready to see how? Book a demo